Rosen Law Firm Urges Krispy Kreme Investors to Act Before Deadline

June 25, 2025
Rosen Law Firm Urges Krispy Kreme Investors to Act Before Deadline

NEW YORK, June 22, 2025 — The Rosen Law Firm, a prominent global investor rights law firm, has issued a reminder to purchasers of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (NASDAQ: DNUT) securities regarding an important deadline in a securities class action lawsuit. The law firm advises those who acquired Krispy Kreme shares between February 25, 2025, and May 7, 2025, to take action before the lead plaintiff deadline on July 15, 2025.

The call to action follows the filing of a class action lawsuit, which alleges that Krispy Kreme made misleading statements about its partnership with McDonald’s, leading to undisclosed declines in demand for its products at McDonald’s locations. According to the lawsuit, these misrepresentations resulted in significant financial losses for investors, particularly as the partnership was not as profitable as suggested, prompting a pause on expansion in McDonald’s locations.

Phillip Kim, Esq., a partner at Rosen Law Firm, emphasized the importance of securing qualified legal counsel to navigate the complexities of the securities class action process. “Investors need to select legal representation with a proven track record in securities litigation to effectively advocate for their rights,” Kim stated, urging those affected to join the class action through the firm’s website or by direct contact.

The Rosen Law Firm has a history of success in handling securities class actions, having secured over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone. Laurence Rosen, the founding partner, has been recognized as a leading figure in the plaintiffs’ bar, as noted by Law360 in 2020. The firm’s reputation is bolstered by its record of achieving the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time in 2017, and it has consistently ranked among the top firms in terms of securities class action settlements since 2013.

The legal framework for the current case hinges on allegations that Krispy Kreme misled investors by failing to disclose critical information about its operational challenges. Specifically, the lawsuit claims that the partnership with McDonald’s, which was initially expected to drive sales growth, instead led to declining average sales per door per week. The revelations of these discrepancies, once brought to light, have led to investor damages as the stock value of Krispy Kreme has been adversely affected.

As of now, no class has been certified, which means that affected investors are not represented by counsel unless they choose to retain one. Joining the class action allows investors to seek compensation without upfront legal fees, as the Rosen Law Firm operates on a contingency fee basis.

The firm encourages all potential class members to take prompt action to ensure their interests are protected, as the ability to recover funds is contingent upon their participation in the lawsuit. Investors may remain passive class members or may opt to take a more active role by becoming lead plaintiffs, which involves directing the litigation process.

Krispy Kreme, known for its iconic doughnuts, has faced increasing scrutiny over its business practices, particularly in relation to its strategic partnerships. The outcome of this class action could have far-reaching implications for the company and its investors, highlighting the importance of transparency in corporate communications.

For further updates and information on joining the class action, investors can visit the Rosen Law Firm’s website or contact the firm directly. The ongoing developments around this case serve as a critical reminder of the potential risks involved in securities investments and the importance of due diligence in understanding the underlying business operations of publicly traded companies.

Advertisement

Fake Ad Placeholder (Ad slot: YYYYYYYYYY)

Tags

Krispy KremeRosen Law Firmsecurities class actioninvestor rightsNASDAQDNUTMcDonald's partnershipfinancial losseslead plaintiff deadlinesecurities litigationlaw firmLaurence RosenPhillip Kimbusiness transparencyinvestor compensationclass action lawsuitlegal counselstock marketcorporate governancefinancial disclosuresinvestor advocacylegal representationclass action settlementNew York lawconsumer goodsfast food partnershipsbusiness operationsshareholder rightsfinancial regulationspublicly traded companieslitigation strategy

Advertisement

Fake Ad Placeholder (Ad slot: ZZZZZZZZZZ)