Supreme Judicial Council Accepts 19 Complaints Against Judges for Review

On July 12, 2025, the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) of Pakistan convened to address allegations against members of the superior judiciary, resulting in the admission of 19 out of 24 complaints for further consideration. The meeting, chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi, was a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to enhance judicial accountability and transparency within the country’s legal framework.

The SJC's decision comes in light of increasing scrutiny over the conduct of judges and the integrity of the judicial system. According to a press release from the council, the complaints were evaluated under Article 209 of the Constitution. This legislative framework empowers the SJC to oversee the conduct of judges and take appropriate actions against misconduct, thereby safeguarding the rule of law in Pakistan. The council's vote to admit these complaints was unanimous, indicating a collective commitment to uphold judicial standards.

During the meeting, Chief Justice Afridi emphasized the importance of a transparent process in handling complaints against judges. "Our aim is to ensure that justice is served not just in the courtroom but also in the conduct of our judges," he stated. The council also discussed the proposed draft of the SJC Secretariat Service Rules, 2025, which aims to streamline procedures and clarify the roles within the SJC.

Legal experts have voiced their opinions regarding the implications of this development. Dr. Sara Ahmed, a legal scholar at the University of Karachi, commented, "This is a significant step towards establishing accountability within the judiciary. The public’s trust in the legal system hinges on the integrity of its judges."

Moreover, the SJC's recent actions come after a series of similar meetings earlier in the year, where 46 complaints against constitutional office-holders were reviewed. In February, the SJC addressed 40 of those complaints, reflecting a proactive approach to judicial oversight. According to Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, a senior puisne judge, the council is committed to ensuring that all allegations are thoroughly investigated. "The integrity of the judiciary is paramount, and we cannot afford to ignore complaints that may undermine public confidence in our legal system," he remarked during the proceedings.

The council's decision to defer five complaints for further examination demonstrates a cautious approach, ensuring that all cases are given the attention they merit. Justice Munib Akhtar, who has been appointed to lead a committee reviewing amendments to the code of conduct, echoed this sentiment, stating, "We must ensure that our processes are not only effective but also fair to those involved."

Looking ahead, the implications of the SJC's actions extend beyond the immediate cases at hand. As the council continues to refine its procedures and enhance its role in judicial accountability, it sets a precedent for future governance within the judiciary. The ongoing reforms are expected to foster a more robust legal environment in Pakistan, reinforcing the principle that no individual is above the law.

In conclusion, the SJC's recent deliberations signal a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s judicial landscape. As the council takes steps to address complaints against judges, it not only upholds the rule of law but also strengthens public trust in the judiciary. The outcomes of these hearings will be closely monitored by legal experts and the public alike, as they anticipate a more accountable and transparent judicial process in the coming years.