California Governor Declares National Guard Deployment Unlawful

June 10, 2025
California Governor Declares National Guard Deployment Unlawful

In a dramatic escalation of tensions over immigration enforcement, California Governor Gavin Newsom has declared the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles unlawful. The troops were sent to quell ongoing protests against President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, which have sparked outrage among local communities, particularly among Hispanic and immigrant populations.

The National Guard's arrival coincided with a third day of demonstrations, culminating in confrontations between protesters and police. The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) declared a rally near City Hall an "unlawful assembly," alleging that demonstrators had engaged in violent behavior, including throwing concrete and bottles at officers. "Arrests are being initiated," the LAPD stated via social media, as they sought to manage the escalating situation.

Governor Newsom, a Democrat, has publicly called for the rescindment of the Trump administration’s order to deploy approximately 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles County, accusing the President of undermining California's state sovereignty. In a statement on social media platform X, Newsom stated, "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President." He criticized the federal government for inflaming tensions and called for the troops to be returned to his command.

In response, the White House refuted Newsom's claims, arguing that the chaos and violence observed warranted the National Guard's deployment. A spokesperson from the Trump administration stated, "Everyone saw the chaos, violence, and lawlessness," framing the National Guard's presence as a necessary measure to maintain order.

The confrontations in Los Angeles have been marked by significant unrest, with demonstrators blocking major thoroughfares such as the 101 Freeway and engaging in clashes with law enforcement. Reports indicated that over 30 individuals had been arrested, with some facing charges of assaulting officers. Additionally, the FBI announced a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of a suspect accused of injuring a federal officer.

During a press briefing, President Trump characterized the protesters as "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and warned of severe consequences for anyone engaging in violent acts against law enforcement. He emphasized his administration's commitment to restoring law and order, stating, "If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, it will be very, very strong in terms of law and order."

The protests reflect a broader conflict between the Democratic-led state of California and the Republican administration in Washington, with immigration enforcement being a pivotal issue. Governor Newsom and other Democratic leaders, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, have expressed that local law enforcement was adequately prepared to handle the demonstrations without federal intervention. Mayor Bass criticized the federal government's actions, suggesting they have exacerbated an already tense situation.

Congresswoman Nanette Barragan also condemned the National Guard's presence, arguing that it would only serve to escalate existing tensions. "It's only going to make things worse in a situation where people are already angry over immigration enforcement," she stated in an interview.

Immigration advocacy groups have echoed these sentiments, accusing the Trump administration of using the National Guard to instigate confrontations and justify its stringent immigration policies. Vanessa Cárdenas, director of the advocacy group America's Voice, remarked that the federal government's actions appear to be aimed at creating a pretext for increased enforcement and control over immigrant communities.

Despite the heated rhetoric, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem defended the National Guard’s role, asserting that their presence was intended to ensure safety for peaceful protestors and law enforcement alike. She noted that the situation in Los Angeles had prompted the federal government to take action.

As tensions continue to rise, the implications of the National Guard's deployment and the administration's hardline immigration stance remain to be seen. Critics warn that these measures may further alienate immigrant communities and increase the likelihood of violence. Meanwhile, discussions around immigration reform remain unresolved, with advocates like Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum urging for comprehensive dialogue rather than militarized responses. Sheinbaum criticized the U.S. approach, stating, "The phenomenon will not be addressed with raids or violence. It will be by sitting down and working on comprehensive reform."

The legality of the National Guard's deployment under Title 10 of the U.S. Code has also come into question, as it stipulates that such orders must be issued through state governors. Governor Newsom's assertion of state sovereignty raises significant legal and constitutional questions about the extent of federal authority in domestic law enforcement matters. As the situation develops, the balance between state and federal powers will be a critical focal point in the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement and civil rights in America.

Advertisement

Fake Ad Placeholder (Ad slot: YYYYYYYYYY)

Tags

Governor Gavin NewsomNational Guard deploymentLos Angeles protestsDonald Trump immigration policyCalifornia state sovereigntyLAPD actionsimmigration enforcementcivil unrestfederal interventionDemocratic leadershipRepublican administrationpublic safetylaw enforcementimmigration advocacycommunity responsepolitical conflictsocial justiceHispanic communitiesLos Angeles Mayor Karen BassCongresswoman Nanette BarraganDepartment of Homeland Securityimmigration raidsTitle 10 US Codefederal authoritycommunity relationsprotest dynamicsmilitary involvement in civil matterspublic opinionnational securityfuture of immigration policy

Advertisement

Fake Ad Placeholder (Ad slot: ZZZZZZZZZZ)