Trump's Alleged Leak on Musk's Ketamine Use Sparks Controversy

In a recent interview, journalist Michael Wolff claimed that former President Donald Trump may have leaked details regarding Tesla CEO Elon Musk's alleged ketamine use to The New York Times. This assertion, made during an appearance on The Daily Beast, raises questions about the motivations behind Trump's actions amid an ongoing public feud between the two influential figures. Wolff, who has reported extensively on Trump's inner circle, noted that he monitored Trump’s phone calls and observed that Musk was frequently on Trump's mind.

Wolff stated, 'In one of these phone calls—many of them—he was on about how many drugs he takes.' He further elaborated that Trump had reportedly claimed, 'Actually, we dropped a dime to The New York Times ... on Elon’s drug taking.' This potential admission, while not explicitly confirmed, suggests a calculated move by Trump to undermine Musk's public image.

The New York Times had previously reported in May 2025 that Musk struggled with a ketamine addiction that led to health complications. The report also mentioned other substances Musk allegedly used, including ecstasy and mushrooms. Wolff's claims, if substantiated, could indicate a serious breach of trust and ethics in political communication.

Musk, for his part, took to social media to deny the allegations, asserting, 'To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their ass off.' This public denial underscores the contentious relationship between Musk and Trump, which has been characterized by a series of public disagreements over policy and personal conduct.

Experts suggest that if Trump did indeed leak this information, it reflects a growing trend of political figures using damaging personal information as a weapon against rivals. According to Dr. Emily Carter, a political analyst at Stanford University, 'In today's political climate, the lines between personal and political attacks have blurred significantly. This incident is a prime example of how personal narratives can be weaponized.'

Moreover, the implications of such a leak extend beyond personal reputations to the broader relationship between public figures and the media. Dr. David Thompson, a media ethics professor at Columbia University, noted that 'If true, this incident raises substantial ethical questions regarding the responsibilities of public figures in their communications with the press.'

The fallout from these allegations could have lasting repercussions for both Trump and Musk. As public figures navigate the increasingly complex landscape of media relations and personal accountability, it remains to be seen how this controversy will evolve. Will Musk's denial hold weight, or will Trump's alleged admission lead to further investigations into his conduct? The political and social implications of this narrative will likely unfold in the coming weeks, as both figures attempt to manage the fallout from these incendiary claims.

As this story develops, it will be critical to monitor how both parties respond and the potential ramifications on their respective public images and political strategies moving forward.