Ombudsman Samuel Martires Awaits Outcome of VP Sara Duterte's Impeachment Trial

In a significant development regarding the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, the House of Representatives prosecution panel has expressed its support for Ombudsman Samuel Martires' position that his office will await the trial's outcome before pursuing any further actions related to allegations against the Vice President. This statement was made public during a press conference on June 28, 2025, where House prosecution panel spokesperson Attorney Antonio Audie Bucoy praised Martires' adherence to procedural correctness.

The impeachment trial stems from allegations involving plunder, technical malversation, and misuse of confidential funds associated with the Department of Education and the Office of the Vice President. The House submitted a committee report on June 16, detailing these charges against Sara Duterte and several officials from both her office and the Department of Education, including Edward Fajarda and Gina Acosta, among others.

Ombudsman Martires elaborated on his office's limitations during an interview, stating, "The Ombudsman or any investigating body has to await the result of the impeachment proceeding." He emphasized that should the Senate impeachment court acquit the Vice President, his office would not have the authority to pursue charges against her. This stance aligns with the constitutional mandate that separates investigative powers from prosecutorial powers, as indicated in the Philippine Constitution.

Martires' comments come amidst scrutiny of his office's handling of the case. Critics have questioned whether the Ombudsman's decision to delay action could be perceived as an attempt to undermine the impeachment process. However, both Martires and Bucoy affirmed that waiting for the impeachment trial's conclusion is essential for upholding legal integrity. Bucoy commented, "It is the proper process," highlighting the procedural necessity of awaiting the trial's outcome before any further action.

In a related context, Martires has stated that the investigation into the allegations could extend beyond his tenure, indicating that the next Ombudsman may be tasked with addressing the case. Martires is scheduled to retire on July 27, 2025, after serving a seven-year term as Ombudsman. His comments on the matter have drawn varied reactions, with some legal experts supporting his cautious approach, while others argue it may delay accountability for high-ranking officials.

Legal scholars, such as Dr. Maria Elena Santos, a Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of the Philippines, emphasize that the separation of powers is crucial in maintaining the rule of law. Dr. Santos stated, "The integrity of the impeachment process must be preserved, and any premature actions could jeopardize that integrity."

As the impeachment trial progresses, the implications for Vice President Sara Duterte and her administration remain significant. Should the trial conclude in her favor, the political landscape may shift, potentially strengthening her position ahead of upcoming elections. Conversely, a conviction could lead to severe repercussions for her career and the current administration.

In conclusion, the ongoing developments surrounding Vice President Duterte's impeachment trial underscore the intricate balance between legal procedures and political accountability. As both the Ombudsman and House prosecutors navigate these waters, the upcoming trial outcome will likely have lasting ramifications for Philippine governance and public trust in its institutions.