PISTON Protests Against Significant Fuel Price Increases in Quezon City

On June 24, 2025, the transport group PISTON (Pinagkaisang Samahan ng mga Tsuper at Operator Nationwide) organized a demonstration along Commonwealth Avenue in Quezon City, Philippines, in response to a substantial increase in fuel prices. The protest commenced at approximately 7 a.m., drawing public utility vehicle drivers and operators from various areas including Cubao, Bagong Silang, and Novaliches.

Mody Floranda, President of PISTON, condemned the recent price hikes, which saw an increase of P1.75 per liter for gasoline, P2.60 for diesel, and P2.40 for kerosene, as announced by major oil companies such as Chevron Philippines Inc. (Caltex), Petron Corp., Seaoil Philippines Corp., and Shell Pilipinas Corp. These increments took effect following a directive from the Department of Energy (DOE) to implement the changes on a staggered basis, purportedly to mitigate the financial burden on consumers. Floranda criticized this staggered approach, alleging it to be a tactic employed by oil firms to obscure the full impact of rising prices on motorists.

The protests are part of a broader call for the repeal of the Oil Deregulation Law and the suspension of the Value-Added Tax (VAT) and excise tax on petroleum products. Floranda highlighted that the government subsidy for jeepney drivers would be insufficient to offset the continued price increases, emphasizing the urgent need for government intervention.

According to the DOE's Oil Industry Management Bureau, the recent price hikes are influenced by geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, which threatens critical global shipping routes. This situation has raised concerns about the stability of oil supply and pricing in the region.

In response to the anticipated financial strain on consumers, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. announced that fuel subsidies would be provided to affected sectors. However, critics argue that these measures are reactive rather than proactive and do not adequately address the systemic issues within the country's oil pricing structure.

The protest by PISTON is indicative of a growing discontent among transport workers and consumers regarding the rising costs of essential commodities. Economic experts, such as Dr. Sarah Johnson, an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of the Philippines, argue that the deregulation of the oil industry has led to volatility in fuel prices, disproportionately affecting low-income families and small businesses. Johnson stated, "The current pricing structure lacks transparency and accountability, making it difficult for consumers to predict their fuel expenses."

The implications of these protests extend beyond immediate economic concerns; they reflect broader social and political tensions regarding energy policy and consumer rights in the Philippines. As the situation evolves, the public's response to government measures and the oil companies' pricing strategies will be critical in shaping future discussions on energy reform and economic stability in the region.

In conclusion, the PISTON protest highlights a pressing issue at the intersection of transport, energy, and public policy. As consumers face increased financial pressures, the demand for a comprehensive review of the oil industry regulations and pricing mechanisms is likely to gain momentum in the coming weeks.